Characteristics

/
0 Comments
            Young film-makers in many countries tried their hand in creating their own “new waves” in the late 1950s and early 1960s. Britain’s working-class cinema of the “angry young men” that basically was about the displeasure towards status-quo. It turns out the new wave movement in France turned out to have the most impact in terms of influence. A core group of directors who were once all film critics for the magazine Cahiers du Cinéma namely François Truffaut, Jean-Luc Godard, Claude Chabrol, Jacques Rivette and Eric Rohmer together with other French directors including Agnés Varda and Louis Malle, became associated with the French New Wave movement. “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it's the only thing that ever has.” (Mead, 1982)

            In the 1950s when film subsidies were bought in by the Gaullist government, this group of directors put their theories into practice. They initially collaborated and assisted each other driving the development of a common and prominent use of form, style and narrative making a clear signature of their work thus making it instantly recognizable.

            France was an occupied country in contrary to England or the United States and the experience of austerity and internal tensions due to two different parties; part of the population sided with the Nazis and part of it resisted – left a mark on the countries conscious and mentality. The philosophy that evolved distinctively in France in the post war years was existentialism. “They wanted to make films in which social and political issues could be explored – films that felt ‘raw’ and new. Taking matters into their own hands (and a dash of inspiration from the Italian Neo-Realist movement), Truffaut, Godard and several others set about changing cinema forever. The New Wave was born.” (Evans, 2009)

In conjunction to our film tribute, we integrated these following elements to portray our understanding towards French New Wave. Our story is basically about a queer male who subjugates himself to live in the perception of the society of a male character up to one point where he faced rejection in career just because of who he is. He then decides to live authentically and be true to his inner self. The characters in these films are often disregarded by society, young anti-heroes and loners with absolutely no family ties. In terms of behavior they are often spontaneous, immoral and deemed commonly as anti-authoritarian. In Godard’s first feature-length film A Bout de Souffle (1959) the protagonist murdered a policeman after stealing a car yet he shows no remorse towards his actions. Our protagonist, the queer male is seen acting spontaneously in terms of how he left the office in a fury of rage followed by his sudden and extreme change of self-presentation. He is also immoral (in society’s eye) as he divulge himself in homosexuality. Most of all he carries no remorse in his actions such as stomping out on the person who rejected him AND also the person who accepted him.


Figure 1. Michel Poiccard committing murder A Bout de Souffle

Taking advantage of the new technology that was available in the late 1950s that enabled the French New Wave directors to work off set they use lightweight hand-held cameras that was initially developed by the Éclair Company for use in documentaries and faster film stocks that requires less light and light-weight sound including lighting equipment. Subsequently one of the key element of a French New Wave film consist of raw sound and lighting to allow the films to be shot quickly and cheaply with such portable and flexible equipment, giving the directors more artistic freedom over their work. A natural and casual look is painted on the film due to location filming. Available lights and sounds are preferred in contrary to studio lighting and extensive dubbing. Camera was very mobile with a great deal of panning and tracking resulting in some shaky shots and only one camera was used in new inventive ways. In A Bout de Souffle (1959), Raoul Coutard the cinematographer, was pushed around in a wheelchair so he could follow the characters as they walk down the street and entered buildings. So in our video it is observable that we used natural light that was available on the spot and we also utilize the raw recorded sound without editing it. There were also scene in which we panned the camera for example the robber stalking his victim.


Figure 2. A cafe scene in A Bout de Souffle

The fact that French New Wave films had a free editing style instead of following editing rules of Hollywood films draws attention to itself. By being discontinuous, reminding the audience that they were watching a film, for example the usage of jump cuts or insertion of materials that are considered extra to the story. One of the director that favored the use of jump cut was Godard. “Two shots of the same subject are cut together with a noticeable jump on the screen. In a Hollywood film this would be avoided by either using a shot/reverse shot edit or cutting to a shot from a camera in a position over 30 º from the preceding shot.” (Nottingham, 2001) For example, in A Bout de Souffle jump cuts are used during the long conversation in the room and in a scene in a car driving around Paris. In our video, after the protagonist slams his hand to express his anger the scene cuts to him exiting and throwing his papers and taking his shoes off. The effect is extremely extra and irrelevant especially the part where he takes off his shoes. In was supposed to express how he is stripping himself off his outer shell but the throwing was paper was enough thus the scene where he takes off his shoes and walked off were completely extraneous.


Figure 3. Riding around Paris A Bout de Souffle

Long takes were also a common element of a French New Wave film, for example, the street scene in A Bout de Souffle where the protagonist walks with his girlfriend. The idea is to construct a loose scenarios to give audience the impression that anything might happen next. Open endings were also distinctive, leaving situations unresolved. Truffaut’s Les Quatre Cent Coups is an example of ambiguous ending with the protagonist Antoine caught looking at the camera in a freeze-frame. In terms of our video, the long takes was shown in the conversation at the bar where the protagonist have drink with the person whom he saved from getting robbed, he then proceeds to just leave all of a sudden after rejecting the guy’s advance with no clear explanation why. The video ended there in ambiguity.


Figure 4. Antoine Doinel looking at the camera in a freeze-frame in Les Quatre Cent Coups

Another profound element was that the actors were encouraged to improvise their lines or talk over each other as if it is a real life conversation. In opposition to staged speeches of the usual traditional film acting, lengthy scenes of dialogues that carries no consequences were shown in A Bout de Souffle. Women were also given strong parts often in conjunction of the archetypal roles seen in most Hollywood cinema in which the hero and the strong role are usually cast towards male for example Corrine Marchand in Varda’s Cleo de 5 a 7 – a woman who proceeded to live freely after finding out she has cancer. Thus choosing our protagonist in our short film to release his inner feminism and yet be in full control was for injecting this element. For example the scene where he overpowered the robber. During the interview and the bar scene the conversations were also improvised by the actor themselves. 


You may also like

No comments: